the "conf" file (
You might recall from the basic administration page that this file is part of the gitolite-admin repo. You need to clone that repo, make and commit changes to this file, and push the commits back.
conf/gitolite.conf file (often called just "the conf file" for short) is
one of the two most important files in gitolite. It specifies repo names and
access rules, as well as repo options of various kinds and git-config values.
Pretty much all day-to-day management, except managing users, happens from this file.
We'll use the following example to describe it's features. (A tip of the hat to Teemu Matilainen's gitolite vim-syntax file for the colors.)
@staff = dilbert alice # groups @projects = foo bar repo @projects baz # repos RW+ = @staff # rules - master = ashok RW = ashok R = wally option deny-rules = 1 # options config hooks.emailprefix = '[%GL_REPO] ' # git-config
As the example above shows, the syntax is fairly straightforward and simple.
- In general, everything is space separated; there are no commas, semicolons, etc., in the syntax.
- Comments are in the usual shell-ish style.
- User names and repo names are as simple as possible; they must
start with an alphanumeric, but after that they can also contain
-. Usernames can optionally be followed by an
@and a domainname containing at least one
.(this allows you to use an email address as someone's username).
- Group names are like simple usernames (i.e., not email addresses) but
start with an
- Reponames can contain
/characters (this allows you to put your repos in a tree-structure for convenience).
- There are no continuation lines by default. You do not need them; the
section on groups will tell you how you can break up large lists of
names in a group definition into multiple lines. (But if you must
have them, you can optionally enable them; look for "continuation-lines"
Gitolite allows you to break up the configuration into multiple files and include them in the main file for convenience. For example:
will include the contents of the file "conf/foo.conf".
You can also use a glob (
include "*.conf"), or put your include files into subdirectories of "conf" (
include "foo/bar.conf"), or both (
Included files are always searched from the gitolite-admin repo's
conf/directory, unless you supplied an absolute path. (Note: in the interests of cloning the admin-repo sanely you should avoid absolute paths!)
If you end up recursing, files that have been already processed once are skipped, with a warning.
It is not a fatal error for an include file to be missing. If it is a glob, you won't even get a warning.
subconf, a command that is very closely
include, is documented here.
Please note that whenever you see "the
conf/gitolite.conf file" or "the
conf file" in gitolite documentation, it means the combined text after the
include processing is done.
You can group repos or users for convenience. The syntax is the same for both and does not distinguish; until you use the group name it could really be either.
Here's an example:
@developers = dilbert alice wally
Group definitions accumulate; this is the same as the above:
@developers = dilbert @developers = alice @developers = wally
You can use one group in another group definition; the values will be expanded immediately (meaning later additions will not appear in the second group):
@developers = dilbert alice @interns = ashok @staff = @interns @developers @developers = wally # wally is NOT part of @staff
Here's a very simple but complete example of using groups:
@developers = dilbert alice wally @foss-repos = git gitolite repo @foss-repos RW+ = @developers
@all is a special group name that is often convenient to use if you really
mean "all repos" or "all users".
warnings on undefined groups
Gitolite cannot truly catch undefined groups because the conf parser is 1-pass, and you're allowed to define a group after it is used, like so:
repo foo RW = @foo @foo = u1 u2
(v3.5.3+) However, in a simplistic attempt to help people tearing their hair out because of a typo, gitolite will warn if a group is not defined when it is used. So if you defined it later, either ignore the warning or move the definition up.
Note that these warnings do NOT appear if you're getting user group info from LDAP.
getting user group info from LDAP
Gitolite's groups are pretty convenient, but some organisations already have similar (or sufficient) information in their LDAP store.
Gitolite can tap into that information, with a little help. Write a program
which, given a username, queries your LDAP store and returns a space-separated
list of groups that the user is a member of. Then put the full path to this
program in an rc variable called
GROUPLIST_PGM, like so:
GROUPLIST_PGM => '/home/git/bin/ldap-query-groups',
Now you can use those groupnames in access rules in gitolite, because the user is a member of those groups as well as any normal gitolite groups you may have added him to in the conf file.
Caution: your program must do its own logging if you want the audit trail of "why/how did this user get access to this repo at this time?" to resolve properly. Gitolite does not do any logging of the results of the queries because for people who don't need it that would be a huge waste.
Some of the pictures are thanks (enormous thanks!) to someone who contributed them but does not want to be named (go figure!). She even converted them to ditaa format when I asked; these are not as pretty as what she sent me originally but they're vim-editable in source form :-)
This section talks about how gitolite's access rules work. It's a very important section, and well worth spending some time on.
Gitolite's access rules are designed to be easy to use for common situations, such as some of the examples you saw earlier. However, they also pack a lot of power and flexibility.
Access rules decide whether a particular access is allowed or denied. An access is defined by four pieces of data: "reponame, username, operation, and ref". Each rule also has four similar pieces of data, and of course there are several rules -- some people have thousands! -- in the conf file. This section will try and explain how these rules are used to decide if a given operation is to be allowed or denied.
what does a rule look like?
You've seen some simple rules so far, for example in the basic administration page. Here's a slightly more complex one, just for illustration.
repo foo bar RW+ = alice @teamleads - master = dilbert @devteam - refs/tags/v[0-9] = dilbert @devteam RW+ dev/ = dilbert @devteam RW = dilbert @devteam R = @managers
A "repo" line names one or more repos, and is followed by one or more rule lines. All the rules from then till the next "repo" line apply to the repo(s) specified in the repo line -- in this example, the 'foo' and 'bar' repos.
Each rule line has a "permission" field, zero or more "refex"es, and one or more user or user group name after the equal sign.
The "repo" line can also have repo groups, as we have seen in the section on groups above. Also, it can have regular expressions that match multiple repos.
Before describing the various fields more formally, here's a description of what this specific rule list is saying:
alice and the team leads can do whatever they want (i.e., push, rewind, or delete any branch or tag).
dilbert and the dev team has these restrictions
- they can do anything to branches whose names start with "dev/"
- they can create or fast-forward push, but not rewind or delete, any branch except master
- they can create (but not update/delete) any tag except tags starting with "v" followed by a digit.
managers can read the repo but they can't push anything.
More formally, a rule line has the following fields:
the permission field
The permission field gives the type of access this rule line permits. The most commonly used permissions are:
- R, to allow read operations only
- RW, to allow fast-forward push of a branch, or create new branch/tag
- RW+, to allow pretty much anything -- fast-forward, rewind or delete branches or tags
-(the minus sign), to deny access.
There are also other, less commonly used, types of permissions.
the "refex" field
You cannot write rules for all possible branch and tag names (i.e., refs) that users will push. The only sensible way to do this is to use regular expressions instead.
A refex is a word I made up to mean "a regex that matches a ref".
If no refex is supplied, it defaults to
refs/.*, for example in a rule like this:
RW = alice
A refex not starting with
VREF/) is assumed to start with
refs/heads/. This means normal branches can be conveniently written like this:
RW master = alice # becomes 'refs/heads/master' internally
while tags will need to be fully qualified
RW refs/tags/v[0-9] = bob
A refex is implicitly anchored at the start, but not at the end. In regular expression lingo, a
^is assumed at the start (but no
$at the end is assumed). So a refex of
masterwill match all these refs:
refs/heads/master refs/heads/master1 refs/heads/master2 refs/heads/master/full
More commonly, a refex of
refs/tags/v[0-9]will match all versioned tags (i.e., not just
If you want to restrict the match to just the one specific ref, add a $ at the end, for example:
RW master$ = alice
You can also use virtual refs to perform extra checks and controls that you can't do with just the normal ref (like refs/heads/master) being pushed. The most common example is restricting pushes by dir/file name, but there are lots of other possibilities.
user/user group list
Like the repos on the repo line, you can have any number of user names and/or user group names on the rule line. (However, please note that there is no concept of regular expressions for user names).
SECTION SUMMARY: at this point you know that each rule basically specifies a repo, user, permission, and a "refex".
All the rules for a repo need not be specified in one place. For example, you might see something like this, perhaps at the top or bottom of the conf file:
# managers should be able to read any repo repo @all R = @managers
or perhaps this:
# anyone can clone open source repos repo @FOSS R = @all
Clearly, both these constructs affect repos which may have their own rules elsewhere.
If a bunch of projects share some naming convention, you can specify any rules that are common to all of them by specifying the set of repos that are affected as a regular expression. Notice that the regex can be defined directly in the repo line, or it can be defined in a group and the group used in the repo line; it's all the same to gitolite.
repo FOSS/..* # ...rules for repos under FOSS/ @secret = secret/..* private/..* repo @secret # ...rules for repos under secret/ and private/
Finally, although not very common, you can certainly do things like this:
repo foo # ...some rules... # ...other repos and rules... repo foo # ...more rules for foo...
Note that the "other repos and rules" may indirectly include repo "foo" (for example it there were rules for "repo @all", or some other group that "foo" was a member of).
When access is being checked for an operation against a repo, all the rules that pertain to that repo are collected, in the order they were seen in the conf file.
Gitolite then discards those rules that do not apply to the user whose access is being checked. (A rule applies to a user if the user's name appears in the rule (after the equal sign), or if he is a member of any of the group names that appear in the rule.)
defining "user" and "repo"
To be very specific, when we speak of "user" and "repo" in rules,
- "user" means "user or a group that he/she is a member of", and
- "repo" means "repo, or a group that it is a member of, or a regex that matches it, or a group that contains a regex that matches it".